نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
Consensus, as the central slogan of the fourteenth administration, has undoubtedly yielded numerous achievements. These accomplishments span critical issues in both domestic and foreign policy. Among them are internal empathy and harmony, and the ability to engage in dialogue with major powers and neighboring countries to dispel the specter of war and political or military violence. However, consensus in contemporary Iran—especially in the context of the fourteenth administration—requires critical analysis. The aim of this is to better understand the existing deficiencies in order to address them and improve the current situation. The pathology of consensus can be examined in two spheres: domestic and foreign policy.In addition to conceptual ambiguity, the main challenges to consensus in these two areas include: The risk of interpreting consensus as power-sharing with political rivals, A lack of sensitivity to fairness and justice in various dimensions, The failure to connect consensus with party politics and the institutionalization of democracy, Ambiguity regarding the boundary between transnational responsibilities & national interests, An unclear stance on alignment policy, & Vagueness in defending proxy forces. This article uses a descriptive-analytical approach, drawing on texts & interviews as its methodology.
کلیدواژهها English
