A Comparative Study of Contemporary Political Islamic Discourses with Imam Khomeini’s Discourse مطالعه تطبیقی گفتمان های اسلام سیاسی با گفتمان امام خمینی (ره)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استاد پژوهشکده امام خمینی و انقلاب اسلامی


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Study of Contemporary Political Islamic Discourses with Imam Khomeini’s Discourse

نویسنده [English]

  • Dr.Yahya Fozi
Professor, Research Institute of Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution
چکیده [English]

In this paper attempts have been made to study the discourses dominating political Islam to answer these questions: How can one categorize these diverse political Islam discourses? What are the similarities and differences among these discourses in general, and with the Islamic Revolution discourse in particular? The research methodology employed for this study is historical-comparative and the hypothesis of the paper suggests that various political Islamic discourses can be categorized into two jurisdictional-rational discourse and narrative discourse. Islamic Revolution is included in the first category. The two discourses, however, have major differences in central signifier and in interpretations on the floating signifiers. To make a more accurate clarification of the two discourses, in this paper the two discourses have been compared and contrasted in terms of terminology and ideological commonalities with political consequences. To that end, viewpoints of the advocates of each discourse on such variables as their interpretations of monotheism and Divine Sovereignty, justice, excommunication, Holy War, Islamic unity, attitude toward Sharia law, characteristics of Islamic government and qualities of an Islamic ruler, attitude toward political rights of people, attitude toward the West, modernization and new civilization have been studied. Findings of this paper show that despite verbal and conceptual commonalities, there are major differences between the two discourses in interpretation of these commonalities, each of which is believed to have serious political consequences.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Political Islam
  • Islamic Discourse
  • Imam Khomeini’s discourse
  • Ahmed, Akbar S. (2004), Postmodernism and Islam: Predicament and Promise. 7th ed. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Amraei, Hamzeh (2004), Islamic Revolution of Iran and Contemporary Islamic Movements, Islamic Revolution Document Center.
  • Binder, Leonard (1964), Ideological Revolution in the Middle East. Ed. John Wiley. New York.
  • Esposito, John (1984), Islam and Politics. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
  • Faraj Abd al-Salam, Jihad: Dominant Religious Duty, quoted from http://www.aqeedeh.com, retrieved on June 5, 2016.
  • Farmanian, Mahdi (2008), Understanding Differences between Shia and Sunni, Tehran, University of Religions and Denominations Press.
  • Fazlur Rahman. Islam (1979) 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fozi, Yahya (2002), Reviewing Capabilities of Shia Reformist Discourse in Iran, Matin Quarterly, No. 17.
  • Fozi, Yahya (2004), Sociopolitical Developments in Iran, Tehran, Oruj.
  • Fozi, Yahya and Hashemi, Abbas (2015), Contemporary Islamist Movements: Regional Reivew, Tehran, Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Center.
  • Gadhi Mohammad Saeid Ashmawi (2008), Al-Islam al-Siasi, Cairo.
  • Haddad, Yvonne (1982), "The Islamic Alternative." The Link 15.4.
  • Harrigan and El-Said (2009), Economic Liberalization.
  • Hassan al-Banna (n.d.), Majmuat Al-Resael, Cairo.
  • Hassan al-Hudaybi, Du’at la Qudat, quoted form http://ikhwanwiki.com/index.php, retrieved on April 4, 2016.
  • http://www.aviny.com/occasion/jang-narm/vahabiat/shenakht-vahabiat/fatva-vahabiat.aspx
  • Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, M., Towhid, quoted from http://www.aqeedeh.com, retrieved on June 4, 2016.
  • Imam Khomeini, Ruhollah (2000), Sahifeh Nour, Tehran, Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works.
  • Janati, Mohammad Ebrahim (1991), Sources of Religious Jurisprudence in View of Islamic Sects, Kayhan, First Edition.
  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1987), "Post-Marxism Without Apologies " New Left Review, 166.
  • Masjed Jamei, Mohammad (1991), Grounds for Political Thought in the Realm of Shia and Sunni Islam.
  • Mavardi, Abul Hassan (1421 H), Ahkam al-Sultaniyah Hanbali, Gadhi Abu Ya’la, Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyah, edited by Mohammad Hamed al-Fiqi, Beirut, Dar al-Kutub al-Elmiyah.
  • Mintjes, H. (1980), "Mawlana Mawdudi's Last Years and the Resurgence of Fundamentalist Islam." Al-Mushir 22.2.
  • Motahari, Morteza (2005), Collection of Papers, Qom, Sadra.
  • Mozafar (n.d.), Principles of Jurisprudence, Rational Independent Rules.
  • Nazemi, Mahdi (2011), Wahhabism in Post-Sept. 11 World of Islam, Andishe Varzan Nour Institute of Religious Studies.
  • Osamatul Ataya (n.d.), Hoquq Valiul Amr va Vajebatohu va Manzelat Velatul Amr fil-Mamlekatel Arabia val-Saudia.
  • Rabbani Golpayegani, Ali (n.d.), Salafi History (Traditionalists and Hanabeleh).
  • Ramadan, Tarek (2004), Western Muslims and the Future of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • RAND (2004), Report.
  • Saussure, f. (1983), Course in General Linguistics, (London: Gerald Duckworth
  • Shepard, William (1987), "Islam and Ideology: Towards a Typology." Int. Journal Middle Eastern Studies 19.
  • Tofiq Yusif al-Waei (n.d.), Al-Raviyat el-Shameliya le-Tavajjohat al-Ikhwanul Muslimin al-Eslahiya, Kuwait, Dar al-Bohuth al-Elmiyah; Sayyid Qutb(1979), Ma'alim fi al-Tariq, Dar al-Shruq al-Tab’at el-Sadesah.